Method

About

What this platform is for, how its evidence is classified, and the rules it holds itself to — including the ones that cost it results.

Purpose

To assemble, in public and with visible provenance, what is actually known about the world before Abraham — and to keep separate the kinds of knowing involved. Text, archaeology and geology answer different questions with different failure modes. Merging them produces confident narratives that no single line of evidence supports.

This is a project of Old Watchman.

Seven evidence classes

Every observation is filed under exactly one of these. They are not a ranking; they are a statement of what kind of thing the evidence is.

ClassWhat it is
physical_archaeologyExcavated material, deposits, structures, objects.
contemporary_inscriptionA text written at the time, on a contemporary object.
later_manuscript_copyA text preserved only in copies made much later.
later_historical_traditionLater writers reporting what they believed happened.
modern_scholarly_interpretationA scholar's reconstruction or synthesis.
proposed_identificationA proposed equation — a name with a site, a person with a person — not an established one.
speculationRecorded as speculation, and labelled as such wherever it appears.

Four gap-aware evidence states

"Not found" is not one thing. A single generic absence hides four very different situations, so the platform distinguishes them everywhere:

PRESENT
The source says it, and we hold the source.
ABSENT FROM HELD TEXT
We hold the text and it does not say it.
UNKNOWN DUE TO GAP
The relevant part is damaged, missing, or unread. We cannot say either way.
NOT APPLICABLE
The question does not apply to this kind of source.

Confidence is ordinal, never numeric

No statement in this platform carries a percentage. A number like "72% confident" implies a precision that textual and archaeological evidence cannot supply, and invites false comparisons between incomparable things. Only bands are used, and a non-UNKNOWN confidence cannot be recorded without a written rationale.

Evidence depth

Depth levels 1–4 measure how close a statement is to physical evidence — not how confident we are. A shallow but certain statement and a deep but contested one are different things, and the scale keeps them apart.

What this platform will not do

Corrections stay visible

When this project gets something wrong, the correction is recorded rather than deleted, so the record shows both the error and the repair.

loading…

Rights

Public domain and explicitly licensed material is preferred throughout. Copyrighted works are held as metadata and a link only. Where a work is lawfully readable but not openly licensed, that fact is recorded per component — because a permission covering a book's text does not cover its photographs.